ALFORD: Limitless Fundraising Creates a Political Wild West

How much money does a Louisiana politician need to win? More. In the increasingly competitive world of high-stakes elections, the answer is simply more.

In the not-too-distant past consultants could tell candidates that $7 million was required to become governor, or $2 million for a congressional seat. But that threshold, especially in recent years, has become a moving target as more third party groups supplement spending and the courts make way for special political action committees to raise unlimited cash.

The latter are known as super PACs and they’re the ultimate status symbol. Created in the wake of 2010’s SpeechNow.org case against the Federal Election Commission, super PACs can raise as much money as they wish, all in the name of political speech, from companies, special interests and individuals. They can then spend it demonizing or blessing a candidate.

Free of donation limits and saddled with only mild reporting requirements, it’s the wild west of political money. If a candidate can attract enough attention from super PACs, winning becomes fairly inexpensive. But they also lose some control over the campaign process, since there can be no coordination. It’s a tradeoff many are willing to make.

Super PACs gained early influence over national elections, but are now a major factor on the state level. An example is the Fund for Louisiana’s Future, created to support U.S. Sen. David Vitter’s campaign for governor. While the rules prohibit super PACs from communicating with candidates, there are no prescripts on the targeted campaigns giving them money.

Few knew this until Vitter’s Senate campaign donated $100,000 to FLF in February, which is undoubtedly the vainest contribution of the election cycle. It’s also the boldest workaround — Vitter cannot use money from his federal campaign account to run for governor, but he can legally funnel it through the FLF super PAC. That may be why, in April, Vitter sent an email to supporters asking for donations for his Senate campaign while referencing a financial need for his gubernatorial bid.

Before FLF came on the scene, super PACs could only accept $100,000 maximum donations for state elections, despite the unlimited federal rule. But it challenged the constitutionality of the state law in court and won. Now the floodgates in Louisiana are opening.

In what may be a sign that political parties are feeling the heat from super PACs, the Republican National Committee and the Louisiana Republican Party filed suit in federal court three weeks ago challenging laws that prevent them from having independent-expenditure accounts with unlimited fundraising capabilities.

The rise of super PACS has created competition for the parties, which must adhere to giving limits. As an operative recently asked me, why would a major donor nickel and dime their influence when they could instead sink $1 million into a focused effort? For the GOP, this is about self-preservation.

The state party wants to control a super PAC without it being labeled as such, for doing so would bar them from coordinating with campaigns. Party sources say the goal is to get the new independent expenditure accounts operational in time for 2016, which coincides with the next elections for president, Congress and Louisiana’s other U.S. Senate seat, now held by Vitter. With the lawsuit newly minted, the next questions become why Louisiana and will the Democrats follow suit.

There’s definitely an upside for candidates. Aside from being able to tap into more spending, it allows them to stay mostly positive while outside groups go negative on their behalf. That’s the case in the U.S. Senate race between incumbent Mary Landrieu and Congressman Bill Cassidy, where campaign ads have been outnumbered by outsider commercials.

With unlimited fundraising already an early plot element in the race for governor, and an emerging one for state parties, it’s safe to assume the super PAC approach could eventually play a role in legislative elections and possibly local contests. But it’s just a warning shot right now and we’ll soon enough see the real and sobering aftereffects in Louisiana’s government.

By drowning out the voices of those with narrow pockets, editing exchanges between candidates and generally blocking access to the democratic process, this trend of no-limits fundraising will indeed create some very dangerous limits, unintended or not.

RECENT STORIES

Possible (Maybe) Deal Coming Together 

This was originally sent to paying subscribers of LaPolitics Weekly on Friday, March 4, at 7:20 p.m. Wish you would have seen it then? Subscribe now! Yet again, it’s all about the penny The House leadership, including House Speaker Taylor Barras, is continuing to develop a plan at this hour that could potentially address the […]

FullSizeRender-3

Governor Says Vote Coming, Questions House Leadership

JBE askes for alcohol vote Friday afternoon… Blames House for lack of progress… LABI offers up sales tax suggestion…  In a press conference with reporters Friday Gov. John Bel Edwards said he has asked the House to vote on legislation this afternoon to increases the alcohol tax. He also placed some of the blame for […]

3d8ad876-b108-4a97-8b67-8de66da4620f

Amendment Directs Money To Group With Ties To Lawmaker’s Family

The House on Friday approved an amendment by Rep. Marcus Hunter that would send proceeds from an automobile rental tax to a Monroe nonprofit with connections to Hunter’s father, former Rep. Willie Hunter Jr. The amendment was attached without objection to House Bill 39 by Rep. Julie Stokes, R-Kenner, which would renew a state tax on automobile rentals. The bill was […]

DEVELOPING: Deal coming together on penny

2:37 p.m.  The House of Representatives voted 76-27 Thursday to approve a one-cent increase to the state’s 4-cent sales tax. It is the linchpin in Gov. John Bel Edwards’ special session plan and now moves to the Senate for further consideration. The administration’s decision not to fight Republicans on an 18-month expiration date and an […]

The Fight To Boost The Penny

(The following story was originally sent to LaPolitics Weekly subscribers at 7:46 a.m. Since then, Rep. Stokes did not appear at the fiscal note review committee and it was adjourned. Wish you would have learned about this developing story hours ago? Subscribe now!) In a late-developing twist to Gov. John Bel Edwards’ proposal to add one penny […]

Edwards Connects with Landrieu

Pro-JBE Group Targeting Lawmakers

With 14 days remaining in the special session, a new 501(c)4 called Rebuild Louisiana is gearing up to help Gov. John Bel Edwards push his agenda through the House and Senate. The launch of a related website on Tuesday coincides with the Ways and Means Committee advancing the governor’s centerpiece proposal to the full House — a […]

Norquist Sends Letter To Lawmakers

February 23, 2016 To: Members of the Louisiana Legislature From: Americans for Tax Reform Re: Governor John Bel Edwards’ Tax Proposals Dear Members of the Louisiana Legislature, On behalf of Americans for Tax Reform and our supporters across Louisiana, I write today to urge you to reject Gov. Edwards’ proposal to impose a host of […]